Thank you all for convening an emergency regional meeting and glad for also acknowledging both the President and Vice President as key leaders of the TYC.
Well, as per your request we will surely send you the scanned copy of TYC Centrex resolutions regarding the Hunger Strike Campaign in New York at the earliest possible time. General Secretary is on leave today and President has not yet joined Office, so we will sent the scanned copy after discussing with them. You all can clearly read and see in our meeting resolutions which was recorded in our Centrex minute book that the Centrex members have decided only to carry out the Hunger Strike in New York from 25th February, 2010 and also on its demands but there were no decisions made on the Centrex members who will represent TYC and on participants during hunger strike. If the President or any members still claims that it is the President who decides, then please cite few examples of past TYC President who has taken such undemocratic decision without consulting or discussing or even informing the VP and Centrex Members? Under which TYC Charter (rules and regulations) or past 40 years resolutions of GBM and WCM or Centrex resolutions it was written or recorded that the Centrex President is authorized to make such decision without even informing the Vice President? Its really funny and immature for TYC Centrex members to be raising such issue, am not even sure if its worth clarifying here but since President seems to be raising this pretty often in my absence that President has sent VP to Taiwan, Mexico and Hungary, I feel its important for me to clarify his only misleading justification for his authoritarian decision.
The first invitation for TYC came from International Union of Socialist Youth (IUSY) in December 2007 and meeting was held in Dominican Republic. At that time, President and we both discussed on the IUSY invitation and he suggested for both of us representing at the IUSY Meeting but I refused by saying that the organizers will give reimbursement only for one member and TYC can not bear the expenses of additional delegations and more over one member was enough to represent an organization. Therefore, President himself went and attend that meeting. If its for his decision as per his justification then we both would have attended the meeting. Its not true.
Then, in January 2008 there was invitation from Taiwan to TYC to take part in a panel discussion on

Because of the limited word account, I cannot post all the context here.
Frankly speaking, I don't kike Tsewang Rigzin. The purpose of my posting the letter here is to remind of you this thing, and hoping for a settlement.
But now, I just want to say, no matter what he has done, we must unite together to struggle for RANGZEN,

Quote by: hometown

Because of the limited word account, I cannot post all the context here.
Frankly speaking, I don't kike Tsewang Rigzin. The purpose of my posting the letter here is to remind of you this thing, and hoping for a settlement.
But now, I just want to say, no matter what he has done, we must unite together to struggle for RANGZEN,

I agree with you.
Rsewang Rigzin, do not make us disappointed again!